The Generational Conflict:
Just a Ghost?

Generational conflict grabs attention, no doubt. But the truth is: age diversity works – when we do it right. Both research and real-life experience show it’s not age that divides us, but miscommunication, power dynamics, and outdated structures. So let’s ask again: Have we spent all these years fighting the wrong battle?

By Robert Eysoldt, March 2025

There’s a ghost making the rounds – not just in companies, but in media, meetings, and mindsets: the ghost of generational conflict.

Boomers vs. Gen Z. Millennials vs. everyone. The so-called generation clash makes for dramatic headlines, bold narratives, and plenty of clicks. But what if – once you take a closer look – that ghost isn’t even real?

Let’s be clear: when we talk about “generational conflict,” we’re not denying that age discrimination exists. It absolutely does. What we are questioning is the popular story that generations are constantly at odds with each other.

The actual problem is not a generational conflict

The late 2024 study „Generationendialog statt Generationenkonflikt“ (Dialogue, Not Division – Rethinking Generational Conflict) paints a different picture:

Only 8% of young employees actually experience generational conflict at work – even though 71% believe it exists.

Most people – across all ages – see age diversity as a strength. In fact, younger employees especially want more exchange with older colleagues to learn from their experience.

The real tensions? They usually come from unclear roles, lack of responsibility, and poor communication – not age.

That becomes even clearer when we look at career perception: 65% of managers believe they offer great growth opportunities to young talent, but only 45% of under-30s agree. That’s not a generation clash – it’s a transparency issue.

And the data keeps piling up…?

In late 2023, Deutschlandfunk Kultur tackled three of the biggest myths about generational conflict – including the tired tropes that young people don’t want to work or can’t be team players. Sociologist Martin Schröder calls the whole idea “a constructed narrative” – with no real foundation.

McKinsey & Company found in their “True Gen” report (2018) that values, attitudes, and priorities across generations are surprisingly aligned.

The American Management Association has said for years that communication breakdowns and unclear expectations cause more friction than age ever does.

And Korn Ferry’s 2022 report “The Silent Treatment” concluded that most popular theories about generational differences don’t hold up scientifically – they’re based on simplified models that rarely reflect reality.

So what we’re dealing with isn’t a generational crisis – it’s a social, cultural, and media-fueled construct, built on stereotypes, one-dimensional storytelling, and a lack of real connection.

If we know this is mostly about perception and structure – what can organizations actually do?

1. Build age-diverse teams based on skills, not birthdates.

2. Introduce reverse mentoring where digital savvy and experience flow both ways.

3. Rethink career models – make them flexible and focused on individual potential, not age.

4. Create inclusive learning opportunities based on real needs, not generational boxes.

5. Set up real spaces for generational exchange – think intergenerational labs, joint projects, or tandem formats.

Bottom line?

The generational “conflict” is more myth than reality. What seems like an age issue is usually about structure, expectations, and missing dialogue. People already recognize age diversity as an asset – and the desire to connect is bigger than the differences.

So now it’s on organizations to create spaces where real exchange can happen: across generations, free from bias, and on equal ground. Because that’s the only way to truly unlock everyone’s potential. And it’s the only way to finally lay the ghost of generational conflict to rest.

With Age Bombs, that’s exactly what I’m working on: blowing up outdated stereotypes, breaking mental barriers, and opening up spaces where it’s not your age that matters – but what you bring to the table.

Here are the links to the studies & articles mentioned:

Generationendialog statt Generationenkonflikt vom Charta der Vielfalt e.V. (German)
True Gen von McKinsey & Company.
The Myth of Generational Differences in the Workplace von der American Management Association (AMA).
The Silent Treatment—Between Gen Zers and Boomers von Korn Ferry.

Autor

Robert

Robert Eysoldt

Robert Eysoldt ist Creative Consultant, Keynote Speaker, Workshop-Moderator, Business Coach – und leidenschaftlicher Age Diversity Aktivist. Seit über 30 Jahren begleitet er Unternehmen im Wandel. Dabei zeigt sich immer wieder: Unser Blick auf Alter und Altern wird massiv unterschätzt. Mit Age Bombs hat er deshalb eine Initiative gestartet, die mit altersbedingten Klischees aufräumt, Altersvielfalt fördert und Generationen wirklich verbindet.
https://zerooverhead.de/

Author

Robert

Robert Eysoldt

Robert Eysoldt is a Creative Consultant, Keynote Speaker, Workshop Facilitator, Business Coach – and a passionate Age Diversity activist. For over 30 years, he’s been guiding companies through change. And time and again, one thing stands out: we keep underestimating how we see age and aging. That’s why he launched Age Bombs – a bold initiative that breaks age-related stereotypes, champions age diversity, and builds real connections across generations.
https://zerooverhead.de/en/